I got this comment on the previous blog entry about Stars 250+ level 80 roster and 5 warlocks (which they considered "not extreme stacking"):
I’m curious to hear your thoughts: How are guilds that run a tight roster supposed to be able to compete against ‘bizarre’ makeups with guilds that field such a large pool of people? It’s so frustrating working to get a well-balanced comp (theoretically) and then get decimated by fights tuned in a ‘gimmick’-y way.
The Short Answer
The short answer is: you don't.
And you accept that -- you don't try to be who you already chose not to be. If you don't have a 50+ raiding roster you won't be able to raid stack.
Raid-stacking helps beat a fight because classes have different abilities and fights need to be sufficiently interesting to be hard (unless you fall back on gimmicky vehicle fights exclusively.)
Fusion is, in part, founded on a philosophy of avoiding raid stacking whenever possible. And we're comfortable with that even though we know the limitations. We accept that we won't be able to get some fights as quickly, but we're still happy because we prefer being who we are rather than a guild who has the ability to raid stack.
For the majority of the guilds out there, there will be someone who raids longer hours, has a bigger roster, has a larger guild bank, has a better server, has less lag, has fewer people on Comcast east coast.... something.
I'd be lying if I said I was never frustrated -- but I try very hard to become un-frustrated, since there's nothing I can do about it. I just work to make Fusion the best it can be.
The Longer Answer
World firsts aren't everything, and I am very happy to give them up in exchange for what we have:
Read more posts by Kyth
Read rest of Article